Legal Opinion

Deichman v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1947No. 32422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

James A. Harris sued R. W. Hart & Company and obtained a money judgment in favor of Harris for the benefit of his assignee, Adelaide Deichman, his sister. Upon appeal the judgment was by this court affirmed on October 24, 1944; Harris v. R. W. Hart & Co., 195 Okla. 5, 154 P. 2d 759. Adelaide Deichman died January 4, 1944. On November 6, 1944, Peter Deichman filed a motion in the district court to *34revive the judgment in the name of Peter Deichman, as administrator of the estate of Adelaide Deichman, deceased, with waiver of notice and consent to revivor by Hart & Company. On the same day, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Jones v. NyeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Harris v. R. W. Hart & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, of the Estate of Stratton B. Kernodle, Deceased v. Edwina McKeelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Mackey v. ChannelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API