Legal Opinion

Mitles v. Young

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1978No. 8803PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHtjnsickee, J.

Paul Mitles filed a complaint in the Common" Pleas Court alleging certain conduct bn the part of E'arl Young, Howard Baker and his former employer, Martin Oil Service, Inc. Later, Mitles filed an amended com-pláint with a jury demand, against the same defendants saying that .Martin Oil Service- Inc., hereinafter called Martin Oil, owed him $44,0.67 in back wages. As a second claim for relief, Mitles said, that Earl Young and Howard Baker, as. agents- of’Martin Oil, falsely j' publicly and maliciously'" accused him of having stolen money from .Martin Oil. Mitles further alleged that Young and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Mullins v. Rinks, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. City of Toledo v. LowenbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Thomas v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sell v. PriceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  2. Eisnnicher v. Bob Evans Farms RestaurantsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  3. Sharp v. Cleveland ClinicOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API