City of London v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
-Opinion of the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
In the petition herein, it is averred that the city of London, a city of the fifth class, had passed certain ordinances establishing a fire zone in that municipality, providing for the character of buildings that should thereafter be erected or repaired in that zone, and also providing for the condemnation of buildings which by reason of their condition had become nuisances or fire traps. The petition further averred that a certain building on Main street in that town owned by the appellees had fallen into such a state of disrepair that it had…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dupoyster v. Ft. Jefferson Imp. Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- South v. TruesdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Harp v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Buckley v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Reneer v. Centertown Educational CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Duvall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.