Legal Opinion

Duvall v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 13, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Tilford

Affirming.

This action was instituted in equity and the testimony heard orally by the court. The clerk’s transcript, shows that an order was entered on the day of the trial,, March 18, 1938, reciting that by agreement of the parties, Mrs. Hazel Bennett was sworn to take stenographic notes in the case, and the judgment entered on the same day recites that the evidence was heard orally in open court and taken by the official stenographer.

Assuming, but not deciding, that this was a sufficient compliance with Subsection 2 of Section 552 of the Civil Code of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of London v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. South v. TruesdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Lundy v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Claypool v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Caskey v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Harlow v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API