Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Snodgrass

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1982No. 66493PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Does an indigent paternity defendant have a constitutional right to counsel at public expense? The trial court held he does not and we agree.

These proceedings were initiated by the State under the uniform support of dependents law. Iowa Code ch. 262A (1979). The relator alleged defendant was the father of her daughter and should be required to support the child during minority and to reimburse the state for support received under the aid to dependent children program (ADC). By mandate of a federal statute the state must commence paternity proceedings against a putative father…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Thompto v. Coborn's Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. State v. ArneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Lavertue v. NimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Swanson v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sex OffendersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API