Legal Opinion

Pratt v. City of Peabody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while alighting from an electric car on Lynn Street, a public way in the defendant city. It was admitted that due notice of the time, place and cause of the plaintiff’s injuries was given by her to the defendant. It was agreed that the street at the place where the plaintiff was injured was more than fifty feet wide; that there were sidewalks on each side of the street, and a line of street railway tracks, six to eight feet from the line of the easterly sidewalk, ran north and south.

The plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stoliker v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Compton v. Inhabitants of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Jones v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Chapman v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Cody v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mulvaney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Elwell v. Town of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Sample v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Delgado v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Catania v. Town of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API