Legal Opinion

Nurdin v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 1980No. 79-1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, CHARLES T., Associate Judge.

This appeal is brought by appellants Marjorie Nurdin and Kal-Mar Construction, Inc. upon the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellee, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Appellant Marjorie Nurdin went to work for an independent contractor, Scientific Industries, Inc., four or five days before her accident. Scientific Industries was an independent contractor of Anheuser-Busch. It *929had a contract with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. to, among other things, clean the monorail trains. Scientific Industries’ employees worked at Busch Gardens from 8:30…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Hall v. HollandSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. McCabe v. Walt Disney World Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Zambito v. Southland Recreation EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. McKay v. Motley ex rel. MotleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walters v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Case v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API