Nurdin v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, CHARLES T., Associate Judge.
This appeal is brought by appellants Marjorie Nurdin and Kal-Mar Construction, Inc. upon the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellee, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Appellant Marjorie Nurdin went to work for an independent contractor, Scientific Industries, Inc., four or five days before her accident. Scientific Industries was an independent contractor of Anheuser-Busch. It *929had a contract with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. to, among other things, clean the monorail trains. Scientific Industries’ employees worked at Busch Gardens from 8:30…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Hall v. HollandSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- McCabe v. Walt Disney World Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Zambito v. Southland Recreation EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- McKay v. Motley ex rel. MotleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walters v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Case v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998