Legal Opinion

Hall v. Holland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 6, 1950PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 So.2d 889 (1950)

HALL

v.

HOLLAND.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.

October 6, 1950.

Hamilton & Langbein, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Baxter Goodlett, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant sued in the court below to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant-appellee's failure to provide him with a safe place to work. Trial was had upon the issues made by defendant's pleas, and the jury found for the defendant. This appeal is from such verdict and judgment.

The only assignments of error argued on this appeal relate to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Fred Howland, Inc. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Breeding's Dania Drug Co. v. RunyonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Rice v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Hickory House v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Messner v. Webb's CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Cecile Resort, Ltd. v. HokansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Grall v. RisdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API