In re the Marriage of Matar
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
In this domestic relations case, we decide that, pursuant to ORS 107.1041 and ORS 107.135(15),2 a court may enforce an agreement between parents not to seek modification of the child support terms of a stipulated judgment of dissolution unless to do so would violate the law or contravene public policy. We also decide that, in this case, father did not demonstrate that enforcement of his nonmodification agreement with mother violated the law or contravened public policy. Consequently, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court. Matar and Harake, 246 Or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Jackman v. ShortOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Gibbons v. GibbonsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Webber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In Re the Marriage of PollockOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Marriage of SheilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Matar and HarakeOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Pollock and PollockOregon Supreme Court · 2015