Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 18, 1990No. Docket No. 16521-84Published

AG, a Swiss corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of petitioner, owned 100 percent of E, a corporation organized in Spain. Spanish law effectively precluded E from making royalty payments to AG for the use of petitioner's intangible property. Respondent determined that an allocation of income from E to AG pursuant to section 482 was necessary to clearly reflect income.

Read the full summary

AG, a Swiss corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of petitioner, owned 100 percent of E, a corporation organized in Spain. Spanish law effectively precluded E from making royalty payments to AG for the use of petitioner's intangible property. Respondent determined that an allocation of income from E to AG pursuant to section 482 was necessary to clearly reflect income. The allocation in turn increased petitioner's subpart F income under section 951. Held, because Spanish law effectively precluded E from paying AG, effectively blocking AG's receipt of the income, there was no impermissible…

1Opinion of the Court

The Procter & Gamble Company, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 16521-84

United States Tax Court

95 T.C. 323; 1990 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 89; 95 T.C. No. 23;

September 18, 1990, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

AG, a Swiss corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of petitioner, owned 100 percent of E, a corporation organized in Spain. Spanish law effectively precluded E from making royalty payments to AG for the use of petitioner's intangible property. Respondent determined that an allocation of income from E to AG…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. BasyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API