Legal Opinion

Gunnerud v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1980No. 3795PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

Shelly Gunnerud appeals her conviction for possession and sale of heroin in violation of AS 17.10.010, 1 claiming several errors were committed by the court. Appellant argues that the superior court (1) improperly denied discovery of a psychiatric report concerning an adverse witness; (2) erred in failing to grant a mistrial after alleged prosecutorial misconduct; and (3) erred in allowing the playing of a tape recording which included evidence of Gunnerud exercising her constitutional right to remain silent after her arrest. We disagree with the first two…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Shell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. Planned Parenthood of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Mathis v. SauserAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API