Legal Opinion

Arlene Horner v. Mary Institute, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1980No. 79-1352PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

Arlene Horner, a female teacher, appeals from a judgment in favor of Mary Insti tute, her private school employer. Horner sued Mary Institute under the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1), for back pay, liquidated damages, and compensation for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. The district court, 1 after receiving testimony, exhibits, and the briefs of both parties, entered judgment for Mary Institute. The court held that Horner had failed to establish a prima facie case that Mary Institute had violated the Act by discriminating in payment of wages on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Irene A. Janzen, Administratrix of the Estate of Waldo R. Janzen, Deceased v. Wilber W. Goos and Ivan GottulaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Corning Glass Works, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Diane Peltier, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. City of Fargo, a Municipal Corporation, Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Thompson v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Morris Obin v. District No. 9 of the International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API