Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Certified Question From 14th Court of Appeals Dist. of Texas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2007No. 131517Published

1DissentWeaver, J.

I dissent from this Court’s decision to deny plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. I would grant the motion for reconsideration and vacate the Court’s decision answering a certified question from the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals of Texas.

This Court’s decision to answer the certified question in this case should be vacated because MCR 7.305(B), the Michigan court rule allowing the Court to answer certified questions from other courts, goes beyond this court’s constitutional authority to answer certified questions.1 Further, the majority’s decision to answer the certified question in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement, Marketing & Consulting Corp. v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bankey v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Certified Questions US Court of AppealsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Certified Question From US District CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Miller v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API