Legal Opinion

In Re Certified Questions US Court of Appeals

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2005No. 127088PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

696 N.W.2d 687 (2005)

472 Mich. 1225

In re CERTIFIED QUESTIONS FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

Sarah Melson, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 127088.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 26, 2005.

On order of the Court, the questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit are considered, and the Court respectfully declines the request to answer the certified questions.

2Concurrence · WeaverWeaver, J.

I concur in the order declining to answer the questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Young; Dissent.

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Sarah Melson v. Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Tate v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Miller v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API