Legal Opinion

United States v. Hindenlang

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 10, 1997No. Bankruptcy No. 96-10250; No. C-1-97-372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

BECKWITH, District Judge.

This appeal from the February 24, 1997, decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court presents the following issue: whether the Bankruptcy Court correctly decided that Forms 1040 submitted by the Debtor for the tax years 1985 through 1988, after the Internal Revenue Service had assessed deficiencies for those years, are tax returns that *848entitle the Debtor to a discharge for the corresponding tax liabilities. For the reasons that follow, the Court AFFIRMS the Bankruptcy Court’s decision awarding summary judgment to the Debtor.

1. Background

The Debtor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Germantown Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HindenlangDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API