Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1938No. 894Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, PJ.

This appeal on questions of law from a judgment in favor of plaintiff below (appellee here), David S. Roberson, raises the question whether or not Roberson, while employed by The Wick-ens Company, sustained an accidental injury while acting in the course of, and which arose out of, his employment.

The appellant, the Industrial Commission, contends that the trial court should have sustained its motion for a directed verdict in its favor, which motion was made at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief and at the conclusion of all the evidence, for the reason that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Petersen v. Corno Mills Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Claim of Dale v. Saunders Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. McNellisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API