Legal Opinion

Dimmett v. Appleton

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Otoe county. Tried below before Hayward, J. cited: Nason v. Best. 17 Kan., 408. Grant v. Marshall, 12 Neb., 488. cited: Sedgwick & Wait, Trial of Little, §§ 401-403. Wade on Notice, §§ 636-638. Miller v. Hurford, 13 Neb., 23.

1Opinion of the CourtEeese, J.

This was an action of forcible detention of real property. The suit was commenced before a justice of the peace, where judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in error, who was plaintiff in the action. Plaintiff in error, defendant there, appealed to the district court, where the cause was tried to a jury, who also returned a verdict in favor of defendant in error, and .upon which a .judgment was rendered. Plaintiff in error now seeks a review by proceedings in error.

The one controlling question in the case is as to the sufficiency of the notice to quit which was served upon plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. King v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peddicord v. BerkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Wilson v. SadlierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API