King v. Connolly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Action of unlawful detainer brought against the defendant for holding over. The plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:
The plaintiff was nonsuited, the notice given by him to the defendant to determine the tenancy having been excluded.
The action was brought in the County Court by the plaintiff, who had leased the premises to the defendant, to hold at the will of the plaintiff'.
The premises are described in the complaint as “ being part of Mission Block, No. 24, commencing at the junction of Market and Guerrero streets; thence running southwesterly along Market street one hundred and forty (140) feet; thence easterly, and parallel to Ridley street, to the westerly line of Guerrero…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Dimmett v. AppletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1886