Legal Opinion
In re D.D.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2001No. 98-FS-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, D.D., was adjudicated delinquent based on a finding that he was guilty of stealing a bicycle tire (D.C.Code § 22-*10971311) (1996). D.D. argues that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that he committed theft, as opposed to the uncharged crime of receiving stolen property (RSP). We affirm.
I
The evidence showed that B.S., an eleven-year-old, and his friend were riding their bicycles near the Reflecting Pool at the Capitol on June 6, 1997. D.D., and a companion, M.N., were together, and approached B.S. D.D. asked B.S. if he could buy the back wheel of B.S.’s bicycle for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Poulnot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Franklin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re D.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re DpDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Jayvon Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017