Legal Opinion

Franklin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1978No. 11307, 11323 and 11343PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Appellants Franklin, Benson, and Dickerson were each convicted, after joint trial by jury, of second degree burglary, grand larceny, and receiving stolen property. 1 Although many issues have been raised, only two need be considered: first, whether the trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion to suppress certain evidence as illegally seized; and, second, whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that it could not find appellants guilty of receiving stolen property if it also found them guilty of burglary or larceny. We hold that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MelearHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. District of Columbia v. M.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. United States v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API