Legal Opinion
Mary D. Pollard v. High's of Baltimore, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2002No. 01-1342PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge HOWARD joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Pollard claims that defendant High’s of Baltimore, Inc. violated her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) by failing to accommodate her disability and by constructively discharging her. Pollard also claims that she was wrongfully discharged under Maryland law. The district court granted summary judgment to High’s. Because Pollard’s impairment during her recovery from back surgery was a temporary one not covered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- William R. Haulbrook v. Michelin North America,incorporated Michelin Americas Research & Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Christina Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Adem A. Albra v. Advan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervening v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Benjamin Reynolds v. American National Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Lester v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.