Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 6, 1930No. [No. 30, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtUkxeb, J.

By this suit in ejectment the appellants dispute the validity of condemnation proceedings under which certain land owned by them was acquired by the City of Baltimore for street widening purposes. The condemnation was conducted under the provisions of chapter 32 of the Acts of 1912, which authorized the Mayor and City Council, by ordinance, to direct the commissioners for opening streets, after giving the notice required by law, to value the damages and benefits resulting to the owners from the acquisition of land for street improvements, subject to the right of the city or the owners to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Steuart v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  3. Branch v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Bonaparte v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. UlmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API