Legal Opinion
GARCIA-FLORES
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1980No. ID 2780PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2780 MATTER OF GARCIA-FLORES In Deportation Proceedings A-22315032 Decided by Board February 27, 1980 (1) Violation of a regulatory requirement by a Service officer can result in evidence being excluded or proceedings invalidated where the regulation in question serves a purpose of benefit to the alien and the violation prejudiced interests of the alien which were protected by the regulation. (2) Where respondent alleged violation of the "warning" requirements set forth in 8 C.F.R. 287.3, record is remanded to clarify the regulatory requirements in this regard, and to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Shweta Kohli v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Rafael Montilla v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Rajah v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Chuyon Yon Hong v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.