Legal Opinion

Dunkin v. City of Hoquiam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1909No. 8204PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered April 15, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for personal injuries sustained by a bicyclist through an obstruction in a street.

1Opinion of the Court

Gose, J.-

This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries. From a verdict and judgment against the city it has appealed.

The complaint states, that the appellant is a municipal corporation of the second class; that Second street is one of its principal streets and is planked for a width of twenty feet; that on September 24, 1908, at 9:80 o’clock in the evening, the street was obstructed by a ridge of soft mud, two feet in height and four to six feet in width, extending the full width of the street; that the city had notice of the obstruction, and that there were no lights or guards to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchwenkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. State v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hoseth v. Preston Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kendall v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Hansen v. SandvikWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kinzell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. HerwitzWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Cook v. Danaher Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API