Legal Opinion

Reed v. Campagnolo

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 6, 1993No. Civ. L-91-512PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATION ORDER

LEGG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek damages resulting from the birth of a child who suffers from a variety of genetic birth defects. Briefly stated, plaintiffs contend that the defendants, two physicians, failed to inform Mrs. Reed, who was pregnant, of the existence and need for pre-natal testing which would have revealed the child’s defects in útero. Armed with this information, Mrs. Reed would have terminated her pregnancy, contend plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ two theories of recovery are wrongful birth and lack of informed consent.

Defendants in this case have…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Naccash v. BurgerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  5. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. CampagnoloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. McQuitty v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API