Legal Opinion

Durell v. Freese

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1931No. 20059PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, C. J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below. This cause presents a review from the judgment of the'district court of Tulsa county, wherein a permanent injunction was issued against the defendant from interfering with certain equipment theretofore placed on the land of the defendant for oil drilling purposes under a lease made by a former owner of the land.

The defendant in his brief says:

“It is admitted in the ease that this equipment and these rods were placed on the land by oral agreement of some kind with the former owner of the land.”

It is shown by the record that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haas v. BrannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Earth Products Company v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Anchor Stone and Materials Company v. CarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Antonio v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Kelly v. Rainelle Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Kelly v. Rainelle Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API