Legal Opinion
City of Boston v. Rochalska
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 18, 2008No. 06-P-2025PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
The city of Boston (city) petitioned the Housing Court for appointment of a receiver, pursuant to G. L. c. 111, § 1271, to bring a vacant property owned by Jadwiga Rochalska into compliance with State sanitary and building codes. After the receiver had been appointed, his role was limited to “tak[ing] all necessary steps to enable the Boston Fire Department to enter the premises in the event of a fire.” Having completed that task, the receiver was discharged, and following a hearing to establish the reasonableness of his claimed expenses, he was awarded $124,353.49.
The intervener, Marian…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Perez v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Negron v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Easthampton Savings Bank v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Dickey v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Cybulski v. VaianiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- City of Malden v. LaSalle BankMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Collins v. Wayland Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013