State Ex Rel. Gann v. Henderson

In this habeas corpus case the petitioner correctly states that “there are two questions now before the Court. The first question is — Was error committed and was the defendant, prejudiced by having one .jury hear and determine at the same time the issues in both cases ?; and, if the foregoing question is answered'in the affirmative, the second question is — Did the Defendant waive his right to object to the cases being heard by one and the same jury1?”

This appeal is from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of a petition for the-writ of habeas corpus which was heard in the Criminal…