Legal Opinion
Inter City Express Lines, Inc. v. Guarisco
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1936No. 1553PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LE BLANC, Judge.
The plaintiff in this proceeding was also plaintiff in an action in tort brought against one H. L. Litchfield, a nonresident absentee. That suit was one for damages to one of plaintiff’s trucks which had been involved in a collision with Litchfield’s Ford V-8 automobile. Plaintiff, availing itself of the provisions of Act No. 215 of 1920, sued out a writ of attachment under which the Ford automobile of the nonresident Litchfield, being at the time in the parish of St. Mary, was seized by the sheriff of that parish. Service of process was made on the absentee through a duly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pugh v. FlannerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Evasovich v. CognevichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Kentwood Bank v. McClendonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Coleman v. CurrieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Edwards v. WisemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc. v. De FeliceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Department of Conservation v. ReardonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- BD. OF COM'RS OF ORLEANS LEVEE DIST. v. ConnickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cryer v. CryerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.