Legal Opinion

FERNANDEZ v. BERRYHILL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00473Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISETTE FERNANDEZ o/b/o I.F. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner : of Social Security : NO. 18-473 MEMORANDUM Padova, J. September 30, 2019 Plaintiff Lisette Fernandez brought this action on behalf of her minor child, I.F., pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1381(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew M. Saul (“Commissioner”),1 denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. After Plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API