Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1976No. 4-74 Civ. 173PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALSOP, District Judge.
This action for violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is now before the court upon motion of the defendant for summary judgment or partial summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
Plaintiffs, who are all individuals, allege that the defendant Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. (hereinafter PJH), while acting in its capacity as a broker-dealer, made various misrepresentations and omissions and engaged in a scheme to defraud in connection with its sale to plaintiffs of stock in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Kopperud v. AgersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Fox Chemical Co. v. Amsoil, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1978
- Burns v. ErsekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.