Legal Opinion

Leslie v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2000No. M1998-00585-SC-R11-PCPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, HOLDER, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted review in this post-conviction case to determine whether the trial court erred by allowing the appellant’s appointed attorneys to withdraw and refusing to appoint new counsel. A majority of the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the trial court did not err either by allowing the appointed attorneys to withdraw or by refusing to appoint new counsel because the appellant had abused the post-conviction process. We conclude, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred by allowing counsel to withdraw without a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. ShirleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. House v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Victor James Cazes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Reid v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. Alex Stevino Porter v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API