Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Seigel

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Victor I. Barron, J.

Plaintiff Ebony Anderson, an infant, by her mother and natural guardian, Christine Anderson, moves for an order remov*740ing this action from the “stay” calendar and setting the action down for an immediate trial, and for a protective order, pursuant to CPLR 3103, denying the request of defendant and third-party plaintiff Frances Silvergate Seigel (Seigel) and third-party defendant New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) for an IQ test of Christine Anderson due to a change in law; or, alternatively, for a protective order deeming “outstanding” discovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Dwyer v. MazzolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Anderson v. SeigelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Anderson v. SeigelNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API