Legal Opinion

Pacific Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bekins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the decree appealed from was given for want of an answer. The suit was brought in the circuit court for Multnomah county, seeking to foreclose a mortgage on lands situate within the county. The principal office and place of business of the defendant corporation was within the county and service on said corporation was made on one of its officers. Service on the individual defendants in the suit who resided in Seattle, Washington, was made by publication. There is no question as to the sufficiency of the service upon any of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Kerschner v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In re BrinnDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1919
  5. Oregon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission of Arizona v. PariseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. In re the Marriage of HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Bekins v. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API