Legal Opinion

State v. Muhammad

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 2001No. COA00-1070PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

Defendant, Kuwsh Abdullah Muhammad, was found guilty in a jury trial of common law robbery and second-degree kidnapping. He appeals the kidnapping conviction, arguing that it violates the prohibition against double jeopardy guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and should have been vacated by the trial court.

We disagree and find no error.

The state’s evidence tended to show the following: Defendant entered a Pizza Hut in Hillsborough, North Carolina, through a back door on 11 February 1999. Jeremiah Cash, an employee, was in the rear of the building…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. FeathersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. RipleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. EscotoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API