Legal Opinion
Roddy v. Herren
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 9, 1939No. 10711PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice:
This statement, thought to be correct, is taken from appellant’s brief:
“Plaintiffs below, the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and E. L. Her-ren, sued Coleman Roddy, defendant below, for property damage done to an automobile owned by Mr. and Mrs. E. L. Herren in a collision with a truck owned by the defendant Roddy. Under a subrogation agreement, the Insurance Company paid Herren all but $50.00 of his claim and sued to recover from Roddy. Herren sued for $50.00.
“The Herren car was > driven by Mrs. E. L. Herren, wife of the plaintiff. The truck, owned by Coleman Roddy,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hines v. ArrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Jimmie Guest Motor Co. v. OlcottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Tarry Warehouse & Storage Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Schuhmacher Co. v. BahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Intges v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Pure Oil Co. v. CrabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Dedear v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Federal Land Bank of Houston v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Buchanan v. LangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.