Legal Opinion

Roddy v. Herren

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1939No. 10711PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice:

This statement, thought to be correct, is taken from appellant’s brief:

“Plaintiffs below, the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and E. L. Her-ren, sued Coleman Roddy, defendant below, for property damage done to an automobile owned by Mr. and Mrs. E. L. Herren in a collision with a truck owned by the defendant Roddy. Under a subrogation agreement, the Insurance Company paid Herren all but $50.00 of his claim and sued to recover from Roddy. Herren sued for $50.00.
“The Herren car was > driven by Mrs. E. L. Herren, wife of the plaintiff. The truck, owned by Coleman Roddy,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hines v. ArrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Jimmie Guest Motor Co. v. OlcottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Tarry Warehouse & Storage Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Schuhmacher Co. v. BahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Intges v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. CrabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Dedear v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Federal Land Bank of Houston v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Buchanan v. LangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API