Marso v. Heck
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BJURCH, C.
Appellant seeks a reversal of the judgment in this action, decreeing specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, upon three grounds: First, because the contract was too indefinite, uncertain, and’ contradictory to be specifically enforced; second, because of delay in commencing an action for such relief; and, third, because during the pendency of the action plaintiff, lost title to the property, and thereby lost the' right to insist on specific performance.
The appeal is from: the judgment alone and the errors assigned are predicated upon the conclusions of law…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weitzel v. LeysonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Van Abel v. WemmeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Walkin v. NokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965