Matthews v. State

PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for pursuing the occupation or business of selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory, with the lowest penalty assessed.

The evidence by the State’s witnesses, which was evidently believed by the jury, was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction, although disputed on some material points by others. Appellant now attacks the State’s principal witness vigorously as unworthy of belief. There is more or less testimony in the record supporting the testimony of this witness. It is evident this attack was also made in the…