Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Marshall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1894No. 16,779PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Vigo Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellee sued the appellants in the court below to obtain partition of certain real estate in Vigo county, describing it, and alleging that she was the owner in fee simple of the undivided one-third thereof, and that appellants owned the other two-thirds in fee as tenants in common with her.

Appellants answered • by a general denial, and filed a cross-complaint on which issues were formed, in which cross-complaint they set up a former adjudication in a suit between them and appellee in the United States Cir-*473cult Court for the district of Indiana, by which they claimed that appellee was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wood v. Jackson ex dem. GenetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  2. McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hays v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Garner v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Doney v. LaughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Huntzicker v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Comer v. LightIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Roberts v. LeutzkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API