Legal Opinion

Charter Township of Van Buren v. Adamkus

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 20, 1998No. 97-71657PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

The parties return to this Court, filing cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Van Burén Township (“Van Bu-rén”), argues that Defendant, United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) by approving the disposal of poly-chlorinated biphenyl (“PCB”) wastes at Wayne Disposal, Inc.’s (“WDI”) landfill, which lies within Van Buren’s borders. The EPA and WDI, an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Michigan v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. National Steel Corporation, Great Lakes Steel Division v. Anne B. Gorsuch, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Oakland County Board of Commissioners v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Charter Tp. of Van Buren v. AdamkusDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A Community Voice v. UsepaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API