Legal Opinion
Valek v. Simonds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Weiss, J.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Esworthy, J.), entered January 2, 1990, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, for an upward modification of child support.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether Family Court should have applied the Child Support Standards Act (L 1989, ch 567) (hereinafter the Act) in its determination of the petition for upward modification of a Family Court order which required respondent to pay $55 weekly for child support. Petitioner alleges that there has been a substantial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vitek v. VitekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Flanter v. FlanterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Quinn v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Weber v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Squires v. SquiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Urbach v. KrounerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Slack v. SlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Pedersen v. PedersenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- McFarlane v. McFarlaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Rathbun v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.