Legal Opinion

Larkin v. Larkin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1886No. 11348PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County awarding costs and counsel fees in an action of divorce. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

— This is an appeal from an order made after final judgment in an action of divorce; The judgment was in.-favor.of.the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed from it and the order denying her. motion for a new trial to this court; After taking such, appeal she applied to the court below for- an order that the plaintiff pay to her, defendant,, a reasonable-, sum for costs and counsel fees with which to-, prosecute ■ her said appeal. The motion was heard on the affidavits of the respective parties, and an order made that the plaintiff pay the attorney of the defendant $175 as costs, of her said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bohnert v. BohnertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Roby v. RobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Painter v. Estate of PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API