State v. Zanker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendants appealed from a judgment convicting them of disorderly conduct. The conviction Avas under a city ordinance which provides that “any person or persons Avho shall make, aid, countenance or assist in making any * * * disturbance or improper diversion, and all persons who shall collect in bodies or crowds in said city, for unlawful purposes or to the annoyance or disturbance of the citizens or travelers” shall be punishable, etc. [Minneapolis Ordinances, 1872-1925, p. 760, § 2.]
Defendants were former employes of the Northbilt Leather Craft in Minneapolis and had been on' á strike for…
2Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- City of St. Paul v. AzzoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. KorichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.