Legal Opinion
At & T Universal Card Services, Corp. v. Sziel (In Re Sziel)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 24, 1997No. 19-05177PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RONALD BARLIANT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is a routine adversary proceeding alleging that the Debtor committed fraud in the use of a credit card. Indeed, the problem is that it is too routine. The Debtor is in default and the plaintiff wants a judgment. Notwithstanding the Debtor’s failure to appear and defend this action, this Court finds that AT & T has not established grounds for finding the debt nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, the motion for default and default judgment is denied. On the Court’s own motion the adversary proceeding is dismissed because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. Murphy (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Chevy Chase Bank, FSB v. Briese (In Re Briese)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1996
- Valley Oak Credit Union v. Villegas (In Re Villegas)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Beltran (In Re Beltran)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mercantile Bank v. CanovasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- At & T Universal Card Services v. Ellingsworth (In Re Ellingsworth)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- In Re WilliamsBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1998
- Mega Marts, Inc. v. Trevisan (In Re Trevisan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- In Re FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.