Legal Opinion

Bradford v. American Federal Bank, F.S.B.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 5, 1991No. CA 3-91-0735-RPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCHMEYER, District Judge.

In this action, Plaintiffs allege that the FDIC and the Resolution Trust Corporation, both in their capacities as successor in interest to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation as receiver for Majestic Savings Association, charged a usurious amount of interest on loans Plaintiffs received from the now-insolvent Majestic Savings Association (Majestic). Now before the Court is Defendant FDIC’s motion for summary judgment or in the alternative motion to dismiss under rule 12(b). For the reasons that follow, the Court will DENY…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Odie Joe Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jobin v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  2. Daly v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First Republic BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API