Legal Opinion · Dissent

Greenawalt's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1941No. Appeals, 44-48Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern:

There is no express provision in the will which authorizes the retention of non-legal securities, nor can I find in its phraseology any grant of such authority made with the “utmost clearness” required by our decisions (Barker’s Estate, 159 Pa. 518, 528, 529, 28 A. 365, 367; Taylor’s Estate, 277 Pa. 518, 524, 121 A. 310, 311). Apart from that, however, I must dissent in this case because of certain other contentions made by appellants which I believe to be sound.

Testator died in 1898, and, while he appointed executors (his wife and the Commonwealth Trust…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Guthrie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Tracy, Co-Trustees v. Central Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Barker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Saeger EstatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API