Borden, Inc. v. Holland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceBeasley, Presiding Judge
I concur fully in Division 1 but not in Division 2. The posture of the appeal, and a consideration of who the appellants are vis-á-vis the proceedings below, render the remaining errors moot.
The appellants, employer Borden and its insurer, appealed from the order of the superior court, which was sitting as a court of last resort as a matter of right. Southeastern Aluminum Recycling v. Rayburn, 251 Ga. 365, 366 (306 SE2d 240) (1983). Their primary enumeration of error is that the court lacked jurisdiction to enter the *823order because, under OCGA § 34-9-105 (b), the time had expired for it to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Synthetic Industries v. CampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Felton Pearson Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Coronet Carpets v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Lanier v. JIM BROWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Atlanta Family Restaurants, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.