Legal Opinion

Tubelite Co. v. Original Sign Studio, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 2008No. 07AP-601PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Klatt, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, The Original Sign Studio, Inc. (“Sign Studio”) and Tammy Kornell, 1 appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to plaintiff-appellee, Tubelite Company, Inc. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

{¶ 2} Sign Studio designs, manufactures, and installs interior and exterior signs. Tubelite began supplying materials to Sign Studio in the early 1990s. In October 2003, Kornell, the president of Sign Studio, completed, signed, and delivered an “Application for Credit” to Tubelite. The application…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Andersen v. Highland House Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy, a Corporation Registered in FinlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Abrams v. WorthingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. H & C Ag Servs., L.L.C. v. Ohio Fresh Eggs, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. v. Good Time Outdoors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Action Group, Inc. v. NanoStatics Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Great Lakes Crushing, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Glen D. Hanson v. Mark Maeder and Maeder Mgt., Limited Liability CompanyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API