Legal Opinion

Card v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 2001No. 94-CF-754, 94-CF-801, 94-CF-1147PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

During jury selection in a murder trial in 1993, one potential juror, a 33-year-old African-American male, had close cropped hair and was wearing a white shirt and bow tie. He was Juror 333. The prosecutor exercised one of his peremptory strikes against this juror out of expressed concern that the juror might be a follower of Louis Farrakhan. The principal issue on appeal is whether this exclusion was constitutionally discriminatory on the basis of religion in violation of the doctrine of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).

We agree…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerry DejesusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Longus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. O'Brien v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API