United States v. Jerry Dejesus
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the government violated the Equal Protection Clause when it peremptorily struck two African American, pre*502sumably Christian, jurors from the venire. The District Court held that race was not a factor in the strikes and that the government’s religion-related reasons for the strikes were permissible. Because we are satisfied that the government’s peremptory strikes in this case were based on the jurors’ heightened religious involvement rather than a specific religious affiliation, and because they were not…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bronshtein v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Williams v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Deborah A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Abu-Jamal v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.